Category: Film history

  • Ritwik Ghatak

    Ritwik Ghatak

    We have had countless guests in Godiwala Bungalow but the memory of one stands out above the rest. Ritwik Ghatak

    Sometime in the early ’70s a Bengali gentleman landed up unannounced at home. He looked like he had seen better days. His entire demeanour was one of defeat, someone at the end of his tether. His clothes looked as though they hadn’t been washed in a long time and he also appeared to be a bit tipsy. It was obvious from the manner Ma greeted him that they had known each other for a long time. She addressed him affectionately as Bhoba and her dismay at seeing him in this condition was palpable.

    I was dying to know who he was but had to wait till he left to find out. Ma said he was a filmmaker called Ritwik Ghatak and he had worked with Baba many years ago in New Theatres. But that was not the only connection because our families had known each other all the way back from their days in Dhaka, before they came to Calcutta in search of better prospects. I digested this information but his name didn’t ring any bells. And then he invited us to see a special show of his film Ajantrik in the Films Division auditorium.

    I was so overwhelmed by the film that I wept at the end and even at a young age sensed that Ritwik Ghatak was a tour de force and a master of cinema. I was not surprised to hear many years later that he was more popular than Satyajit Ray in France.

    Soon after his first visit he came over again, accompanied by two young acolytes. He was definitely drunk this time. He slurred as he explained that he had not been able to make a film in years but he wanted to make a fresh start. So he was planning to write a script, which if approved, would get him a loan from NFDC. Ma was delighted by the news and promptly invited him to stay with us while he wrote the script. Bhoba Kaka happily accepted her offer and landed up soon after with bag and baggage, and the two acolytes in tow. Ma realised they would be staying too. She arranged for their stay next door in our cottage, so that he could work in peace and also be out of her hair, thereby killing two birds with one stone.

    Little did she realise that she had taken on one of the biggest challenges in her life. Though she knew Bhoba Kaka drank she didn’t know he was a complete alcoholic. Soon after, the houseboy who went to clean his room came back in disgust and reported that there was a foul stink and there were empty bottles lying around. Ma pulled up Bhoba Kaka who heard her out meekly and said he would stop. But of course he didn’t. Things seemed to get worse, so Ma questioned the acolytes and discovered Bhoba Kaka had made no progress on the script.

    She demanded to see Bhoba Kaka immediately. He landed up with an abject and apprehensive expression on his face. I have rarely seen Ma more angry. She said he should remember he had a family to maintain, a wife and two young children. This was his one chance to redeem himself and he was throwing it all away for alcohol. She told him that he was being extremely irresponsible and she wanted him to promise her that he would not drink again until he had completed his script. She warned him that she would not allow him to leave till he had finished it. To my surprise, Bhoba Kaka literally fell at her feet and wept, and promised to honour her word. And he did.

    And that was how the script of Jukti, Takko Aar Goppo (Ideas, Arguments and Stories) was finally completed.

    Bhoba Kaka was a changed man at the end of his stay. He looked well kempt, well fed and purposeful. He touched Ma’s feet when he left, telling her that he considered her like his mother. Quite a compliment! In a happy ending NFDC approved the script, sanctioned the loan and the film got made. I wish I could end by saying ‘And they lived happily ever after’ but Bhoba Kaka’s life was like a Greek tragedy and I suspect he died an unhappy man.

    I wish he had lived to enjoy the glory of his global status, acknowledged as one of the all time greats of Indian cinema.

     

    Ritwik Ghatak (Nov 04, 1925 – Feb 06, 1976)
    
    Jukti Takko Aar Gappo was Ghatak's last film.
    It won the National Film Award for Best Story.
    
    The film is autobiographical.
    Ghatak also dons the role of Nilkantha. 
    He plays a disillusioned intellectual who drinks like a lord.
    In Hinduism, Nilkantha is Lord Shiva.
    The lord drinks poison to save the universe.
    
    
  • Protima Bedi — ultimate enfant terrible, model, Odissi dancer, sanyasi

    Protima Bedi — ultimate enfant terrible, model, Odissi dancer, sanyasi

    Every Bombayite of our generation had heard of Protima Gupta. She was the ultimate enfant terrible. People spoke in hushed whispers about her streaking through Samovar restaurant. For those who came in late streaking was big in the ’70s in the west. It meant running through a public place stark naked usually as a protest against some burning issue of that time. I have no idea whether there was an issue behind her streak, but as far as I know, no one else has done it before or after Protima in India.

    I first saw Protima when I was around 10. She was one of 12 top models of the day who were enacting a tableau called (rather unoriginally) Women of India. Protima played a medieval princess from Kerala, and she certainly fit the bill. Rehearsals were in the Taj Mahal Hotel Crystal Room and I loved slipping into the cool darkness from the blinding sunlight outside. You must be wondering what I was doing there. My sister Aparajita had been selected to play Sanghamitra, a princess turned Buddhist monk, who travelled to South East Asia to propagate Buddhism many centuries ago. Aparajita was only 14, so Ma sent my sister Yashodhara as a chaperone and I happily tagged along. But of course Protima was not even aware of my existence at the time.

    Protima was an attention seeker. She made sure she was in the news by doing one outrageous thing after the other. But the biggest scoop she created was when she married Kabir Bedi. Kabir was the other person every Bombayite of our generation had heard of. And some lucky people had the good fortune to see: in a loin cloth. He played Tughlaq in Alyque Padamsee’s stage production of Girish Karnad’s first play, and in the the curtain opened on a virtually naked Kabir standing with his back to the audience getting dressed by his underlings. He had both a face and body to die for and the loss of his single status must have broken many a heart. And so Protima Gupta became Protima Bedi.

    I did not meet her again until I was in my 20s. She spotted me at a function and came up to me and said: You are beautiful! I remember squirming in embarrassment and trying to beat a hasty retreat. But she was made of stern stuff. She pursued me and extracted my phone number and address. A few days later she landed up unannounced, tweaked my cheek and said: Bee-yoot-ti- fullll! and then invited Ma and me to her first Odissi performance at Prithvi theatre.

    Protima did not have particularly good features but as she danced she transformed herself into a Goddess. Her voluptuous figure transformed the sensuous moves into a temple statue come alive. Ma and I were mesmerized. She had started learning the dance form from the doyen of Odissi Kellucharan Mohapatra at the age of 27 and in a year’s time she was ready for her first public performance. A remarkable achievement indeed.

    Soon after she invited us to a baithak of Pandit Jasraj in her Juhu home. I told her I had always wanted to learn Hindustani classical music, and the very next day she called to say she had fixed up Jasraj’s disciple Chandrasekhar Swamy to tutor me. Sadly, both my musical journey and Protima’s interest in me died a natural death, and it was several years before I met her again in Hyderabad. In the intervening period she had pulled off a major coup by getting a piece of land from the Karnataka Govt. and setting up Nrityagram, her idyllic dance school. My sister Aparajita had invited her troupe to perform at a mega-event she had organised as part of the Hyderabad 400 years celebration.

    By this time Protima had turned into a Buddhist monk, so her appearance had undergone a major transformation. She had shorn off her tresses and had a crew cut instead. Her behaviour had changed too. She was cool and distant and it almost seemed as though we had never met before. I never saw her again. A couple of years later, the news about her mysterious disappearance in the Himalayas while on a trek with a group of people sent shock waves all over India, because by then she had become a national figure. For some reason, the news shook me up and I felt a personal sense of loss. But it seemed a befitting end to Protima’s life. Her death made the biggest news splash ever. She would have loved that.

     

    Protima Bedi
    12 October 1948 – 18 August 1998
    Model - Odissi dancer - Sanyasi
    Founder of Nrityagram, the dance village
    

    Nrityagram photo courtesy: Pavithrah

  • Impact of digital platform on Kolkata film market

    Impact of digital platform on Kolkata film market

    digital
    What has caused the death of single screen theatres? Unlike in the past when were they were the only platform for watching feature films, today a variety of alternative media are readily available. The technological wave has effectively ensured that the spectator isn’t required to travel any distance at all to watch their desired film. Additionally, they may do so at a very minimal cost and as per their convenience.

    Piracy too has a terrible impact on film business. Crores are being spent on making films, but leakage of original footage during post-production or preview screening or festival screening results in the availability of high-quality footage for audiences at a minimum cost or without any cost at all. This drastically minimizes footfalls at theatre and ruins the possibility of recovery of investment.

    The third problem relates to the quality of the viewing experience. Lack of maintenance of the projection system, the seating areas, and the cooling system in the old single halls drove audiences toward the newly developed, properly-maintained multiplexes where they could live the movie experience on a screen with crystal clear images and Dolby digital 5.1/ 7.1 sound while lounging lazily in a recliner. At Kolkata, most of the single screen theatres had an average capacity of 800 seats and it was getting rather difficult to sell even five percent of the hall capacity on weekdays. Since costs such as electricity, maintenance, and manpower resource remained the same, the recovery of daily operational costs posed a major problem for the exhibitionists, and in the last half decade, most were compelled to permanently shut down. Currently, there are only four—yes, only four—single screen theatres in the whole of Kolkata.

    In earlier times, people were habituated to celebrate any occasion by watching movies at the theatre, but in today’s fast-paced world, the joint family concept is obsolete. And almost every individual in the city has the power in their hands—the smart phone, in which most any movie is just a click away. As family get-togethers are rare, bulk booking of seats in theatres too is now rare. To add to this, television has captured the evening life of housewives so strongly that they have little wish to venture out of the comfort of their homes and their favourite daily soaps. On the occasions that they do, on the weekends, their first priority is for content similar to that of their daily soaps. This is why the weekend business of single screen theatres such as Navina, Star, Priya are successful. These single cinema halls have their own geographical benefit too as they are equipped with all modern facilities like their rival multiplexes.

    Riding on the regular footfall of college students and corporate professionals especially on the weekends, multiplexes such as Inox, PVR, and Cinepolis used to enjoy good business in Kolkata. Comfortable and world-class experience of watching cinema is the main reason for this. However, there has been a drastic decline in recent times — before the pandemic made things even worse — primarily due to the hiking of ticket prices as well as those of food and water. After a survey, it was found that around INR 1,000 is spent for watching a movie at a multiplex, by a family or a couple who are working in a corporate setup; and that 1.5 times of the ticket was spent on food items and water. Many first timers prefer not to be repeat customers, and are opting instead to watch films on digital platforms such as Netflix, Zee5, Amazon Prime, Hotstar, and Hoichoi.

    India experienced an internet revolution around half a decade ago. The launch of the mobile network ‘Jio’ drastically altered the distribution platform of content, especially films. It opened the doors for audiences to a theatre full of films on their Smartphone and Smart TV. Many young working professionals who used to be regulars at multiplexes are now loyal customers of digital streaming platforms. They are now required to pay only a relatively trifle sum, as monthly or yearly subscription fees. 2K and 4K Smart TV with home theatre offers them theatre-like experience at home, there is no need for them to wait for show time, and they are allowed too to pause at any point of time during the streaming.

    It is thus boom time at the moment for digital platforms. Netflix, Amazon Prime, Zee5, and Hotstar are busy acquiring digital rights before the theatrical release of films. And satellite channels have their own digital platforms — Hotstar is part of Star, Zee5 is the digital platform of Zee, and Voot is a platform of Colors (Viacom18). Channel owners are even uploading episodes of daily soaps on the net before they are telecast on their own channels. There is no need now for one to wait for the telecast of a favourite show or feature film on TV. The early availability of content as well as the option to watch content at any point of time makes digital platforms highly popular. This also puts a much-needed check on piracy in the digital market.

    It would be very difficult to bring back the aura that the episodes of Ramayana and Mahabharat once had. The days when people wouldn’t dare miss an episode and/or its repeat screening as there was no other option of watching them ever again is long gone. Some might even argue that it would be impossible for theatres to ever again pull crowds the way films such as Sholay and Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge once did. This of course isn’t entirely true. For, even though everybody knows that all such content would be available on alternative platforms within weeks, if not days, the thrill of watching films on the huge screen in a huge hall with a huge crowd is an altogether different experience.

    But yes, perhaps that day is not too far off when the single screen theatre would be as rare as the tram or the yellow taxi in Kolkata.

  • The 1st International Film Festival of India, 1952

    The 1st International Film Festival of India, 1952

    I missed the first International Film Festival of India, because I was too young to be allowed to see the festival films. There was a precondition that only ‘adults’ were allowed to see the programmes. I had to wait my time. The late Ms. Amita Malik, who was then a broadcaster in All India Radio and an art critic in private, was suddenly asked by AIR Delhi to move to Delhi overnight to cover the film festival in sound. The local news daily, The Statesman roped her to file daily reports on the proceedings. She later gave me, some years later, an eyewitness account of the first film festival organised in India as it developed. Besides her writings for The Statesman on this event, her autobiography provided for additional details. To say the least, this film festival was poorly archived for future generations. As we approach this year, marking the fiftieth edition of the international film festival of India, there is a major problem to find those who were there in the crowd.

    Our story must begin from mid August 1947, when Jawaharlal Nehru made a policy statement for this government when the issue came whether India should join the British Commonwealth organisation, or not. Jawaharlal Nehru had observed that India shall open all its windows to allow the entry of all that was good in human progress and ideas. The film festival was also a good idea. But in this case it was under development in far away in Paris in the mind of Jean Bhownagarey, the European representative for the Indian National Congress based in Paris. Bawanagarey was a man of substance from a Parsee family, who was given to spending his time in moving in the company of Parisian high society, talking of the freedom struggle being waged against the British in India. He, in the course of his travels in Europe, had seen the reopening of film festivals in Cannes and Venice. In his latest tour of India after Independence he had talked of this idea to both Indira Gandhi and her father.

    On a fair day of 1950, the newly appointed State Minister of Information and Broadcasting, R.R.Diwakar, found a note written by Nehru asking him to explore ways and means to hold an international film festival in India. The idea was that such a festival will prompt the Indian film industry to be projected before an international platform and begin an exchange of cinema fare and intellectual ideas. Nehru’s word was law for Diwakar, but he had no clue on how to take on this command. He rushed reportedly to Indira Gandhi, who was just waiting for such a thing to happen and Indira Gandhi pushed Diwakar into the laps of Bhowanagarey, now appointed Media Advisor to the Central Government, who smiled and obliged! Bhowanagarey advised that the first international film festival needed to be organized by the newly created Film Division because then it would be possible to get State funding, State support in manpower and the State apparatus of media assistance etc.

    Bhowanagarey reached out to the various regional film chambers of commerce to get their involvement. Most of the office bearers were ignorant of what help they were expected to do, but soon enough they got the message that the Indian film industry under them, would need to put up exhibitions extolling the growth and impact of their products. In Bombay the Azad Maidan next to Metro Cinema was booked and converted into an Exhibition ground. Stalls were marked and allotted to film distributors who were supposed to pay rental to the Film Division which would provide for some pin money to overcome expenses. The stall owners could put up their film fares. Most the stall holders erected film posters of the films they had produced or were making during the year. Film distributor Rajshree claimed they had 500 theatres in their charge to show movies. The other film distributors erected posters of film Ek Do Teen, Amber, Saqi, Khubsoorat etc. Even the Chinese participation was a few posters of their latest films. A make shift open air theatre, with three screens, was also erected to show short films which were entered in the Festival. To say the least, it was amateurish. Things were better organised in Calcutta which saw the display of the most modern film studio equipment and machinery associated with film making. Many international manufacturers saw in this event the first opportunity to open offices in India and some even planned to start manufacturing units.

    The office bearers of Indian Motion Picture Producers Association (IMPPA) were asked to get their members off their stools and agree to be part of the Organising Committee and Reception Committee for their regions. Regional Committees were created to look after the film festival which was now slated to be a travelling show starting from Bombay (Mumbai), then move to New Delhi, followed by Madras (Chennai), then Calcutta (Kolkata), and informally close in Trivandrum (Thiruvananthapuram).

    More success came from the participation by film artists. That was a photo opportunity into history. In Bombay, actress Suraiya and Veena led the galaxy of film artists into the inaugural function. At that time they were the queen bees of Bombay film world. Some actors and actresses living in Bombay in a rare gesture, invited some of the guest actors and actresses who were delegates to the international film festival, to their homes as home-stay guests. The American delegation however preferred to stay in the best hotel in town.

    The Indian government sent out invitations both through its embassies located worldwide, and also contacted directly with the foreign ambassadors based in Delhi, requesting for representatives of their respective film industries to come as guests of the Indian government. Chester Bowles, who was the US ambassador in India, sent a special mail to his government that the US delegation from the American film industry, ought to have a presence of well known names who were known to have ‘leftist’ leanings since Nehru favoured such persons and otherwise was greatly influenced by Soviet culture. Chester Bowles wanted a foothold for the American film industry in India which till now was influenced by British cinema . Frank Capra, who was the leading light in the professional world of the American film industry, and had lately demitted office as its President, was appointed as leader of the US film delegation to attend the Indian festival both in Bombay, New Delhi and Calcutta. Frank Capra proved to be the right choice. He garnered all the spotlights of the Festival!

    The Festival finally saw the participation of 23 countries including USA, UK, USSR, China, India, Egypt, Italy, France, East Germany, FDR of Germany, Sweden, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Turkey, Spain, Malaya, Japan, Hungary, Sri Lanka, and Canada, among others. The film festival itself featured in all, 40 feature films and about a hundred short films and documentaries. The feature films screened, included Yukiwarisoo (Japan), Fall of Berlin (USSR), Bicycle Thief (Italy), White Haired Girl (China) The River (USA), Dancing Fleece (UK), Miracle of Milan, and Rome Open City (Italy). India offered Awaara (Hindi), Patal Bhairavi (Tamil), Amar Bhopali (Marathi) and Babla (Bengali). Awaara was not screened in Calcutta when the package went to that metro.

    At the conclusion of the travelling Festival, there was widespread opinion that the exposure of film artists and technicians of the Indian film industry to the works of international cinema was meaningful and an eye opener. Film Yukiwarisoo was immediately made into an Indian clone called Bhagyawaan. The neo realist Italian cinema influenced Bimal Roy and his friends and they went on to make the celebrated Do Bigha Zameen. Raj Kapoor armed with his IPTA membership, financed Boot Polish.

    The International Film Festival was officially inaugurated in Bombay on 24th January 1952 , by the State Minister for I&B, R.R Diwakar; in New Delhi, the Indian Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru took centre stage on February 16. In Calcutta the Festival was inaugurated on 29th February 1952 (It was a leap year!). When the Festival moved to Madras to be inaugurated on February 7, 1952 the sudden death of King George VI in England sent the Indian Government into a flurry of protocol activity. It was resolved that all the films from England in the Festival would be withdrawn at once, and the Union Jack was flown at half mast.
    While in Bombay the official function was held in The Regal Theatre, in New Delhi the newly constructed auditorium of the National Physical Laboratory at Pusa Road, was selected for the official function. In Calcutta, the open ground outside the Eden Garden Stadium was partially converted to act as the main venue for the opening ceremony, while some marquee movie halls were booked to screen the international film programme.

    In Bombay, Calcutta and Madras the program for the foreign delegated included visiting some film studios. In Bombay and Calcutta the foreign delegates were impressed by the use of outdated film equipment to make still good quality films. In Delhi the film delegates were all sent to Rajghat to offer their respect to the Father of the Nation, and one of the evenings was booked for tea with Dr Rajendra Prasad, President of India at the Rashtrapati Bhawan. Those who wanted to visit Agra for seeing the Taj Mahal got a good glimpse as the Taj Mahal was closed to public access that day.

    Most of the film delegates from foreign countries thinned out their stay in India after the opening ceremony in New Delhi. Frank Capra still pushed himself to Calcutta. No foreign delegate was reported to be present in Trivandrum. In fact Trivandrum was not even on the circuit map of the film festival. It was added by the government when many film makers in Kerala protested for being ignored. Therefore official brochures do not mention Trivandrum as one of the festival venue while media reports of the day, mentioned the screenings.

    1952 was also a very important landmark for the Indian film industry. During the year the Cinematograph Act was also passed. In the debate the effect of the international film festival was repeatedly made.

    At the end of this film jamboree, the Indian government could not make up its mind whether to make the event an annual feature for India or not. The original festival had been bannered as ‘International Film Festival’ or “IFF”. In the intervening years, the government was told to call it the International Film Festival of India or IFFI. This was the first film festival in Asia, and the third in the world after Venice and Cannes.

    It took a lot of push to recall the whole exercise in the second International Film Festival of India, in 1961. Four years later in 1965, IFFI was made a competitive film festival, By this time the writer of this feature had reached the age when he could see the ‘adult films’ of the IFFI, and gain entry to the movie halls in Delhi/New Delhi with paid tickets in hand.

     

    https://iffigoa.org/asias-first-film-festivals-iffi-over-years/

     

    [divider size=”1″ margin=”0″]

    Photo courtesy: IFFI 2016 from the IFFI archives.

     

  • A brief history of Konkani cinema

    A brief history of Konkani cinema

    Since 2004, cinema audiences from other parts of the country have started converging to the State of Goa at least once a year to witness international cinema. In the process some effort has been made to rediscover if Goa ever had a tradition of films.

    Before cinema came to make any inroads in this small patch of territory ruled as a colony by the Portuguese government, the people of Goa had already crossed the ‘international border’ and found jobs in Bombay, now Mumbai, in its film studios.

    In the Silent Era of Indian cinema there was one actress Ermileen Cardoz who had taken station in Bombay and Calcutta and acted in over a dozen silent films of indifferent credit. It was her good looks that gave her a head start in films. She stayed in the industry till she acquired middle age looks and then retired into the sunset. She was not alone.

    Goa sent out to Mumbai, Bangalore and Chennai a large number of technicians, helping hands, and even a set of well-respected musicians and music composers, to contribute to film making. Goa’s iconic export in talent is undoubtedly the Mangeshkar family, dominated by Lata and Asha.

    Goan musicians took hold of the music trade in Bombay from the time of World War One when there was an influx of foreigners. But when sound came to cinema, the talented Goan instrumentalists moved in to join the Marathi and Hindi cinema studios and be part of their production line. The famous trumpeter Chic Chocolate was not only known as a versatile musician competing in fame with the better known American jazz musicians but also played bit parts, especially in the well known film ‘Howrah Bridge’ (1954).

    Being a colony of the Portuguese rule, Goa did not see the entry of cinema exhibition until sound came to the subcontinent. The mother country, Portugal, was still just above the poverty level, and colonial enterprise was still limited to mining for minerals and cultivation of traditional cash crops like cashew nuts and mangoes.

    The first theatre to screen films was developed out of a shed in Panaji itself where today the building of the Panaji Municipal Corporation is located. Called ‘Eden Cinema’ it was an experimental effort created out of a barrack structure and attracted only foreigners into its ravenous cavity. The effort however succeeded in showing that there was a limited audience keen to patronize cinema. Thus, a more formal cinema hall was constructed near to the Eden Cinema, called ‘Cine Teatro Nacional’. The construction was done by a business house called ‘Casa Rau’ owned by the Deshpande Brothers.

    Old records inform that this cinema hall, beautifully decorated in Deco style, was opened on November 25, 1935, by the Governor of Goa. The first film to be screened was a Hollywood musical production “The Kid From Spain”. This was followed by “Sky Devils”. The ticket charge was equal to today’s 50 paise and seats were numbered with rows named as A, B, C, D, etc. Unlike in the rest of the Indian territory, where there was segregation of women members in the audience as ‘mardana’ and ‘zanana’, no such division was made in the seating order here.

    The next development in Konkani cinema history came in 1949 when a local group of artists from the Konkani theatre (tiatr) decided to experiment with making a celluloid film. Their effort, called Mogacho Aunndo or ‘Loves Craving’ was premiered in a local Mapusa cinema hall on April 24, 1950. The film for sheer curiosity attracted a sizeable local clientele and saw a moderate commercial success. It was smuggled out of Portuguese Goa to Bombay to be shown to its wider clientele. Once in Bombay, it saw a successful morning show run in the local Rivoli (Matunga), Liberty (Fort area) and Star (Mazgaon) theatres. This effort however did not lead to the birth of a new Konkani cinema.

    Goa soon came under a political cloud as a movement for its independence began, led by Ram Manohar Lohia the Socialist leader. The colonial administration fearing a rise in micro nationalism in the arts, clamped a ban on any attempt to make new Konkani films, and language theatre also came to be discouraged and scripts censored minutely to find out any nationalistic signs.

    There was no film production in the Konkani language until Goa became a part of India in 1961. Egged on now by the influence of Marathi cinema across the interstate border, the second Konkani film was launched in 1962 itself and released in 1963. It was called ‘Amcham Noxib’ or ‘Our Luck’. The commercial success of this small film really launched Konkani Cinema in a modest manner. It led to some of the artists of Konkani theatre sharing time and glory both in drama and film acting interests. The people of the Konkan speaking area now looked forward to their own ‘stars’.

    The period of the 1960s saw the town of Panaji develop itself, following its integration with the Indian mainland, and commerce suddenly increased manifold. With trade, came a new population, to settle down. Business boomed and there was now a new need for additional entertainment. Marathi cinema could also find its new outlet here.

    Panaji now saw its next new cinema hall, called ‘El Dorado’, constructed where today stands the Municipal Market. The movie hall was later demolished to make way for a new commercial complex. But soon the Cashew King of Goa, Mr. E Zantyes, took a liking to the film business and moved in. He opened new cinema halls in Panaji, Mapusa, Margoa and elsewhere. His two cinema halls in Panaji were ‘Ashok’ and ‘Samrat’ Status quo remained thereafter until news came that IFFI would get shifted from New Delhi to Panaji.

    There was one big swift activity in the open ground behind the Old Medical College, and a film complex called Inox Complex was developed and opened in 2004. This Complex, consisting of four screens, and with seating capacities suited more to the daily needs of the local audiences, proved miserably inadequate for an international event.

    Locating IFFI in Goa had one uncharted effect. It created an interest in the search for the roots of Konkani Cinema. Stray efforts were now made by film enthusiasts to find out the past of Konkani Cinema, its related roots, and the people who crowded it or represented the area in other language cinemas in the country.

    In 2009, a local film enthusiast, Rajendra Talak compiled the first ever compendium on Konkani Cinema and titled it ‘Konkani Chalchitram’.

    Goa, despite 12 years of IFFI until 2015, still has not developed a dedicated cinema audience. Film crews from Mumbai were still descending in the countryside to undertake film shooting but this did not enthuse the local youth to take to film making. The Konkan language had a limited spread and business wise the experiment to make films was still risky.

    The story of the discovery of the oldest evidence of Konkani cinema needs to be now told. For quite some time, ‘Amchem Noxib’ with its complete film print was considered as the oldest Konkani film, though recall of the earlier film released in 1950 remained in public memory. Then it all happened suddenly.

    It was on March 30, 2015 that one Bardroy Baretto appeared before a film archivist (Shivendra Singh Dungerpur) with a reel of film claiming it was the end part of the first Konkani film. The film was found to be ‘Mogacho Aunndo’, directed by Al Jerry Braganza. This particular film reel had remained in possession of a Pune banker-journalist, Isadore Dantas.

    The discovery was very important. Firstly even as a fragment of the original, it was a proof that despite the microscopic population of the spoken language, a feature film had been made to assert the anthropological identity of the area. Some quick research into old fragments of newspapers revealed that this particular film was released commercially in Mapusa on April 24, 1950, and taken out of the Portuguese colony to Mumbai for screening. As popular interest ran high on this discovery, a complete publicity sheet poster was discovered, one that was good enough to make duplicate copies of.

    The second Konkani film,‘Amchem Noxib’, led to the recognition of Konkani film’s first regular film director, a local musician Frank Fernand, who had gone on to make another successful film in 1966, namely, ‘Nirmon’.

    The story on how the single reel of the first Konkani film came to be preserved is in itself also a lesson for all of us and for the State of Goa to ponder.

    It seems that when Bardroy Baretto appeared before this film archivist with the single reel, the reel was afflicted with all the damage that was possible. It was brittle, and it was sticky and ‘wet’ in parts as chemicals were reacting to atmospheric air to melt the cellulose.

    Immediately the film reel was dispatched to the world’s best film restoration laboratory, L’Immagine Ritrovata, in Bologna, Italy. The laboratory accepted the material with no guarantee of success. The material was first put through a process of drying out the affected areas that had become wet, after which an attempt was made to rehydrate it to remove its brittle state.

    When the film material was soft enough to handle, a very slow process of un-spooling began using various solvents. It took months to unravel the 500 odd feet of material. Finally with digital technology the imagery was restored but the sound track is still under construction and may take another one year before a fully restored version of the original one reel of the first Konkani film is realised. This restored reel has a running time of three minutes.

    In the mean time a new search has begun to trace out the other parts of the film, which may still be lying around in some store premises in Mumbai.

    It is here that an intervention by the State as a patron of arts is expected. Currently there is no facility in Goa to protect or preserve the works of film directors who are now making films in the Konkani language. There is also no official plan to start such a project.

    A small facility should now be considered for locating a centre for the preservation and restoration of all material that speaks of Konkani culture, cinema included. This centre could also preserve features films in Coorgi and Tulu languages and of other minority languages of the area.

    We have two licensed centres for assistance, namely, the National Film Archives of India, in Pune, and the National Museum Restoration Laboratory, in New Delhi. There is also a private company in Mumbai that has started work on film restoration and does quality work in this direction. Their help should be taken.

    Statisticians suggest that between 1950 and 2014, Konkani Cinema has recorded the production of 45 films. Not all of them are produced in celluloid format. Some films made after 2004 have been made in the digital system, which allowed filmmakers to cut down the cost of film projects drastically, and led to an increase in film production. Still there is yet no reliable data on the total number of films made in the Konkani language and the field is open for future film scholars to discover new information on this cinema.

    Some new developments happening in this area need to be mentioned now. One significant change is the expansion of the commercial territory for Konkani films. The other important change was the emergence of Konkani films in the list of awards in the National Film Awards.

    The traditional area of this language had remained for centuries in parts of north Karnataka, all areas of Goa, and the neighboring districts of Maharashtra. Migrant populations speaking this language were to be found in some parts of Pune and areas in Mumbai.

    The territorial expansion of this language began to be noticed as sea faring Goans began to cross the Arabian Sea to find jobs in the Middle East. First they remained on ships. But soon enough they took to the shores to work as cooks, drivers and aayahs in the homes of the rich locals and Europeans expatriates. The more enterprising Goans entered into business enterprises and acquired wealth. They would still return to their home grounds during Christmas to be with their relatives and brush their language skills. Their more permanent presence came to be now noticed in nations like Dubai, Oman, Abu Dhabi, and Kuwait. The number of Konkani speaking population serving in the Middle East and on ships worldwide was now equal to the population remaining on the subcontinent.

    This was also a Konkani cinema audience! And no one had seen it from that point of view.

    In 2012, some one sitting in Kuwait did exactly that!!

    In 2012, Sheron Mozerello made a film ‘Tum Kitno Kortolo Asho’ and launched it from Kuwait. The film director also became the first ever woman film director of Konkani Cinema. She explained her decision to begin the screening of her film from Kuwait as commercially sound so that she could garner her costs from her Middle East Konkani audiences first, and then come to India to her roots and show her work with no fear of suffering a loss.

    This woman’s thinking proved correct. Konkani Cinema had now found a new commercial territory in two new sectors, namely Middle East and the world shipping routes.

    Beginning from 1961, the Konkani language was included in the category of ‘Other Minor Languages’ in all consideration of support to the language. The National Film Awards also treated this language likewise. Today the annual production of Konkani films is a modest under a dozen, and from this lot at least one film manages to garner a National award for the best regional language film, and thus acquire some immortality.

     

    [divider size=”1″ margin=”0″]

     

    6 films will be screened in “The Goan Story – A Konkani Film Package” section at IFFI 2019: A rainy day, Amori, Digant, Juze, K Sera Sera, & Paltadacho Munnis.

    Photo courtesy: joegoauk44, Konkani Film Shooting of DIGANT | https://www.flickr.com/photos/joegoauk44/6217608943

     

     

     

     

     

  • The Journey of Assamese Cinema through the Ages

    The Journey of Assamese Cinema through the Ages

    Walking down the roads of Calcutta very many years ago, a college youth remarked to his friend, “If I can make an Assamese cinema I would attain salvation.” Thus began the history of Assamese cinema.

    The incident happened at the beginning of the second decade of the last century. The author of these words, and the architect of the Assam film industry, was Jyotiprasad Agarwala. It was the age before the birth of the sound movie, and world cinema was still in its infancy. At such a crucial time, Jyotiprasad dreamt of producing a sound movie and went to Germany to be trained in the art of filmmaking. One fine day, he returned from Germany, built a studio in Bholaguri Tea Estate, captured the scenes there, edited the film in Lahore, and released the first Assamese film in Rounak Hall in Calcutta in the March of 1934—four years after the birth of the sound movie in India. The film was about a rebellious female character of Assam history. This periodic and big budget film was more mature and rich in literary qualities than the majority of other Indian films of that era.

    It would be relevant to say that Jyotiprasad who was interested in a new medium such as cinema was an earnest worshipper of newness and a sincere devotee of novelty and innovation. He effervesced Assamese music with newness. His songs were, and still are, popularly known as ‘Jyotisangeet’. And he imported new spirit and lustre to both the body and soul of Assamese drama. Jyotiprasad’s ‘Joymoti,’ the pioneer Assamese film, is but a part of this devotion to art. The film was released in Guwahati Theatre Hall on March 20, 1935, and went on to be screened at various other places in Assam. The production cost of the film was fifty thousand rupees, but it could earn only twenty thousand rupees. His second film, ‘Indramalati’ was made with a consolidated budget. The film was not only a commercial success, but also relieved the producer from the financial burden of the earlier film, ‘Joymati’. As the film was made investing scanty money it lacked in production values and technical beauty, but Jyotiprasad did not compromise on the the beauty of the story and the narrative bounty. It is essentially a love story set around India’s freedom movement. The story also raised a zihad against the issue of untouchability, and comprised some scenes of solidarity between the hills and the plains. Though Indramalati was made to capture the mass market, Jyotiprasad had not strayed away from his duty as an artist. Worshipping beauty was not the ends and means of his life. In addition to being a devotee of culture, he was also a fearless freedom fighter. He composed songs to arouse nationalism and to inculcate patriotic feelings among all Indians. These songs are a part of the indispensable wealth of Assamese culture. It is a blessing that the cinema of Assamese was created out of hope, and by such a highly responsible, educated, and visionary artist, in a proper, succinct way.

    Assamese cinema has now passed 78 years, but the journey has not carried on smoothly. The limitation of the scope of screening Assamese cinema always creates depression; for this reason, Assamese films cannot become commercially successes. This medium of art depends on heavily on machines and demands huge amounts of money for production. Hence, there is less scope of minimizing the budget. Yet, Assamese films are made by some people because of their passion for it or due to somebody’s natural instinct for self-revelation. Only a few films are able to get back the money spent for its production. The same problem is faced by other regional films of India in regions that are not very populous. To help Assamese cinema, the state government had earlier taken a few important steps such as establishing a film studio with government aid, setting up of a film corporation for the development of cinema and establishing a centre of film education. Recently, the state government of Assam took a decision to extend financial aid of the same amount earned by an Assamese film as entertainment tax. I was announced that the said amount would be paid back within a year of the film’s release. Among all the above-mentioned handouts, producers showed the most interest in getting back from government the cumulative amount of money that the film earned as entertainment tax.

    Initially, genuine producers profited from this help extended by the government, and they were able to produce more films with the tax returns. Eventually, though, this got turned into a black market racket. Dishonest producers began polluting the whole process by adopting dubious tactics. On tax papers, they showed that Assamese films were screened at the night shows. In reality, third-rate films were screened instead, and the tax collected from these screenings were claimed as entertainment tax of the supposed Assamese films. This unhealthy practice was conducted by producers with the help of exhibitors as well as corrupt tax officials. As a result, the whole procedure of financial assistance extended by the government grew mighty slow and tedious.

    As stated earlier, the shooting of the first Assamese film was done in the studio built by Jyotiprasad Agarwala in Bholaguri Tea Estate. Since the commercial returns were not fruitful, he did the works of his second film in Calcutta. At that time, Calcutta was the centre of producing Assamese movies. Assamese filmmakers were required to take shelter in Calcutta not only for shootings and settings but also for the help of the film technicians of Calcutta. Thus, the Jyoti Chitraban Studio, named after Jyotiprasad Agarwala, was established in Guwahati under the aegis of the Assam Government, to decrease the dependency of Assamese films on Calcutta.

    At such a crucial juncture, an Assamese film producer instead of going to Calcutta, chose to set and shoot his film in ordinary houses in Assam with the help of a few apprentices and learners as well as technical assistants from Assam. The name of Brajen Barua’s film is Dr. Bezbarua. It was a super hit beyond all expectations. Though it is unlikely that the success was primarily due to the real-life local settings, the film nevertheless offered a major moral boost to Assamese filmmakers and freed them of their dependency on Calcutta. Brajen Barua’s innovative mind, his courage to accept the risk of working with a new team of local artists and technicians, and his interest in creating a band of new technical persons; and the beginning of Jyoti Chitraban—the conglomeration of these two things brought novelty and excitement. Consequently, the production of Assamese films immensely increased.

    In the film industry, the film director is responsible for all the things that make up his film. They are therefore ideally required to be talented to some extent in all related fields. Brajen Barua was such a talented artist. Before coming to the film world he was a singer, and he began his film career as a music director and an actor, in ‘Smritir Parash’ (The Touch of Memory). The director of this film was his brother Nip Barua. Eminent Assamese poet Keshav Mahanta too appeared as a composer of songs in it. And Ramen Barua lent his voice for this film. All these geniuses came from the same family, which eventually became famous as the ‘Barua family’ in Assam. Following this film, Brajen Barua took to directing films, leaving music in the hands of his brother Ramen. In addition to being a singer and a music composer, the latter discovered quite a few singing legends. Ramen later gave up singing and introduced another brother, Dipen, to the music world of Assam. Dipen Barua continues till date to be a successful playback singer. He has also tasted success as a screenplay writer and a director. Two other brothers, Niren Barua and Girin Barua, are connected to the film world as assistant director and actor. And a few young men of the next generation of the Barua family too have associated themselves with the film world in some way.

    Brajen Barua was a multifaceted genius—a poet, music composer, storywriter, screenplay writer, actor and director. As an actor, his extraordinary roles in ‘Dr. Bezbarua’ and ‘Opaja Sonor Mati’ created two immortal characters. But why he acted only in his brother Nipa Barua’s films as well as in his own films is still a mystery. The music director of Nipa Barua’s first few films was Brajen Barua; Ramen Barua joined him as the director of music in the films of the second part of his career. In one of his films Anupam Choudhury appeared as a music director. Why Ramen Barua did not work in that film is also another riddle.

    Bhupen Hazarika entered the arena of Assamese film in his very childhood as singer and actor in ‘Indramalati’, the second film of Jyotiprasad Agarwala. Then, in ‘Siraj’, the sixth Assamese film, he assisted Vishnu Rbaha with two of his songs; he wrote the songs and composed the tunes. He worked as an independent music director in ‘Sati Beula’, the 10th Assamese film. This was the beginning. After that he directed music in Bangla, Hindi and Bhojpuri films. From music direction to film direction he manifested his extraordinary expertise and transformed one of his radio-play to an exquisite film ‘Era Bator Sur’. There were lots of autobiographical elements in ‘Era Bator Sur’. The presence of some well-known artists of Mumbai gave another dimension to the film. This was the first Assamese film that built a bridge between Assamese and Mumbai film world. Bhupen Hazarika was the first Assamese professional artist who had resigned from a university job and went outside Assam. Besides contributing to Assamese music and culture, he produced a number of brilliant films to his credit. He is the only Assamese artist honoured with the Dada Saheb Falke Award.

    The number of directors who later on look forward to producing films is relatively high in Assamese cinema. The music director of the third Assamese movie ‘Manomati’ later on made ‘Badan Barphukan’, the fourth film of Assam. He was not the director of music in that film; Gaura Goswami lent his music to it. From a music director, Bhupen Hazrika too turned a film director. Bhupen Hazrika was the second one who transformed from a music director to a film director. Brajen Barua stood third in this row. One popular music director Upen Kakoti also produced films. Jubin Garg, Nayanmani Barua, and Sadananda Gogoi too began to make films after working as a music director in a few films. Only Brajen Barua retired from music direction after he had begun his career as a director of film.

    Some camerapersons later turned into film directors. In the history of Assamese cinema, Sujit Sinha, Bhabani Nath and Nalin Duwerah are a few names to cite. Nalin Duwera’s ‘Mamota’ made on sylvan settings with a low budget manifests his excellence in filmmaking. For lack of money he did not go to a studio for recording of the music of ‘Mamota’. Instead, he recorded the music in an open field while all were sleeping. The music duo Basanta-Manik who lent their music to ‘Mamota’ later on created many immortal songs. Another renowned Assamese music duo was Kula-Atul.

    Coming back to Mamota, it must be said that Rudra Barua won the National Film Award –Special Jury Mention for his heart touching acting. This was the first national level award won by an Assamese film. But Rudra Barua became popular only as a musician, for his new style of singing. At the National Film Awards, the first winner of the best regional film was ‘Piyali Phukan’, directed by Phani Sarmah. From that time onwards, Assamese films have been able to carry off awards for regional films. In film direction, Assamese cinema has won awards twice; but more awards are received in the field of film criticism. Assam is the recipient of five Swarna Kamal and two Jury Special Mention Awards for film criticism, and with such honour, Assam, no doubt, enjoys a prestigious place.

    At the International Film Festival of India too, many Assamese films since the time of Bhabendranath Saikia’s ‘Sandhyaraag’ have made it to the Indian Panorama category.

    Quite a number of notable awards, a few commercially successful films, and a certain amount of government aid, on one hand; and on the other, innumerous commercial flops, and failure to win prizes for artistic excellence—with these two extremes, Assamese cinema is well on its way to touch eighty years. The present hot discussion in the Assamese media with respect to Assamese films is that a market for it is near nonexistent and that, therefore, to set out to make an Assamese film is to set out to make a loss. Ironically, even though there is a lack of audience for Assamese films, and many Assamese films may not even have the opportunity of a week of screening in the cinema halls, a decent number of Assamese films are still being produced in Assam. Perhaps, this is the inexplicable magic of cinema—the unavoidable, endless passion of the film world—maya.

     

    See also:

    https://filmcriticscircle.com/journal/jyotiprasad-agarwala-and-his-film-joymoti/

    https://filmcriticscircle.com/journal/new-wave-in-cinema-of-northeast-india/

  • The Untold Story

    The Untold Story

    Manipur, on the easternmost part of India, bordering with Mynmar (Burma) is a small state having rich cultural heritage and charming landscape; its people are endowed with inborn talents in dance, drama and music; it has a thousand year old history with uniqueness of its own kind.

    Manipur had the experience of viewing peep show and magic lantern right from the later part of the 19th century. Mr. Grimwood, Political Agent of the British Colony, himself was a good painter, arranged slide shows for the Princes and the nobles of the palace. From the early part of the 20th century people had the experience of enjoying the Bio-scope which had surpassed all forms of entertainment in the society. However, Manipuris started late to make films of their own as late as 1972. They considered cinema as a part of production of the Western technology and thus was beyond their apprehension. At the same time the rule of the colonial government of the British blunted their sensibility from 1891-1947. However when they joined the select band of film makers in the North East, there was no looking back ever.

    Cannes Film Festival stands for superlativeness of both the Festival as well as the film. There is no further questioning about that. It is even regarded a notch higher than the Venice Film Festival which is the oldest of its kind. In the memorable Tous Les Cinemas du Monde (Cinemas of the World) Section in 2007 having viewed not less than in 108 Indian films Sergei Sabezyuski short listed only seven Indian Films – SAIBA (Director : Biju), LAGE RAHO MUNNABHAI(Director : Rajkumar Hirani), MISSED CALL (Director : Mridul Tulsi Das and Subramaniam), VEYIL (Director : Vasantlan), DOSAR (Director : Rituparna Ghosh), DHARAM (Director : Bhavana Talwar) and GURU (Director: Maniram). It must have been a perspiring job – to select 15 out of 108 in the first round and then to shortlist 7 of them finally. As Sergei Sabezyuski had said – “There was no compromise on quality”.

    Generally, a country is entitled to one day only to screen their entries, but India was given two days on that occasion. It seems western cinegoers have started warming up to the songs and dances that go inevitably into the making of an Indian film. In truth these songs and dances enable to express the emotions awakening in the viewers’ mind. These seven films were admixture of small and big budget films. The regional and diverse cultural elements must have nestled comfortably deep inside the French viewers’ psyche. Print and electronic media reported in earnest the screening of seven Indian films in Cannes. Sixteen years prior to this, in 1991 ISHANOU, a Manipuri feature film directed by Aribam Syam Sharma was screened in Cannes in it’s the “Uncertain Regard Section”. It was the only film selected that year to represent India not the film of Adoor Gopalakrishnan, Shyam Benegal, Manikaul, Kumar Shahni, Amol Palekar, Mrinal Sen or Jahnu Barua etc. The uncommon phenomenon of a possessed Maibee and the related folk dance movements that made up a holistic cultural presentation, the strong narrative of simple family might have charmed the establishment in Cannes. It was one of the highest honours ever shown to Manipuri film maker and the art of Manipuri film. But there was not a ripple of appreciation in the world of Indian cinema. There was nothing like a wide coverage from the side of the national media and to tell the truth the matter was scarcely reported in the papers. During the 15thAnniversary of the publication of Eastern Panorama held in Shillong, Union Tribal Affairs Minister, P.R. Kinda and Chief Minister of Assam, Tarun Gogoi were made to pour out the hurt in their hearts by saying that the national media intentionally neglected the north east. They did not try to know Manipuri film or they did not want to. But the French had already measured and measured well Manipuri films.

    X-Cine Productions (IMAGEE NINGTHEM) happens to be the first ever Manipuri film that got entry in the Panorama of Film Utsav, Kolkata in 1982. In those days the International Film Festival of India was held alternately with the Competition Section in one year under the title “The Film Festival” and Non- Competitive Section the next year under the title of “Filmotsav”. On 7th January, 1982 that year’s Panorama films were screened as Matinee Show in the New Empire Cinema Hall, Kolkata. The attendance consisted of about five or ten foreign delegates, Indian film actor – Amol Palekar, two gate keepers, one or two Festival staff on duty and the two or three persons who had gone there representing X-Cine Productions in that gargantuan cinema house that could accommodate at least fifteen hundred spectators. The director of IMAGEE NINGTHEM, Shyam Sharma did not participate in the Filmotsav. IMAGEE NINGTHEM was in black and white, the inherent technical flaws were extreme…patches of darkness or at best grim resolutions marred the clarity on the whole. The film lacked in clarity of images. Film critics – Derek Malcolm (Great Britain), John Warrington (Great Britain), Eichen Berger (Switzerland) and film maker – Patricia Moraz (Italy) on the other hand claimed this film as “Surprise of the Festival”. The beauty of the film was not affected at all by the technical flaws. Alain Jalladeau who was one of the Festival Co-Directors of the “Festival Des Three Continents ‘82’”, Nantes consisting of Asia, Latin America and Africa films came with his brother Phillip Jalladeau to view new films in the Filmotsav 1982. On 9th January, 1982 the third day after screening of IMAGEE NINGTHEM we that included K. Ibohal Sharma, Producer of the film, Smt. M.K. Binodini, Script writer and myself had a meeting with the two brothers Alain Jalldeau and Philip Jalladeau on the beautiful lawn of Grand Oberoi Hotel, Kolkata. In the course of the meeting, they handed us an Invitation to participate IMAGEE NINGTHEM in the Nantes Film Festival. It was unexpected because such a thing as extending an invitation to participate in another film festival while the present festival was going on is indeed a rare event which may not be seen again in the future also. The three of us did not know how to express our thankfulness. We were overwhelmed with wonder filled joyousness. Alain’s selection proved correct – in the festival des Three Continents, 1982, Nante the Manipuri film IMAGEE NINGTHEM bagged the Grand Prix and happened to be the first of its kind too for India as well.

    Indian cinema critics and film buffs usually limit their ken at the Bengal horizon. Any of renowned critics, film scholars as Iqbal Masood, Sunil Kothari, Amita Malik, Chidananda Das Gupta, John Dayal has not mentioned any Manipuri or Assamese film while making individual list of top ten Indian films. Iqbal Masood who writes for the Indian Express as well as the Illustrated Weekly of India, who had also cheered spraying champaign when IMAGEE NINGTHEM won the Grand Prix wrote under the title “Under Western Eyes” in the Festival News of the Film Festival of India, 1985 – “the film IMAGEE NINGTHEM was derivative, reflecting some of the worst features of the rebellious Bengali Cinema”. A French critic retorted to Iqbal Masood’s seemingly fault finding criticism. “My Son, My Precious (IMAGEE NINGTHEM)” conquered Europe by its innocence and exoticism – qualities not impressively visible to the Indian critics …. IMAGEE NINGTHEM which Iqbal Masood mentions and GODAN were considered in India as small insignificant films of no great and abiding interest. For us (Westerners), though they may not be perfect, their interest comes from the fact that they take simple subjects where rapport between the characters is invested, with a much large significance. This is what, in an entirely different way, Pialat, Rohmer and Godard too, are doing……. It appears there is a trend of suppression of smaller states and their achievements by bigger states in India when they start making themselves known in art, in the development of their cultural identity; in short when they make their general identity more fulfilled.

    Yves Thoraval, a French writer in his book the CINEMA OF INDIA (1826- 2000) has this to say – illuminating Manipur, a state between Assam and Myanmar, became a Union Teritory in 1956, gained statehood in 1972 (ch.xi, P.438) despite of some indiscrepencies in the historical facts, he says regarding the songs and dances of this land – “its musical and dance traditions, mostly of a religious character, figure among the most beautiful and the most personalized aspects in India”.

    Further he writes in details about Manipuri film directors as Aribam Syam Sharma, M.A. Singh, K. Ibohal Sharma, Oken Amakcham etc. as an introduction for them to other foreign readers.

    All these are about celluloid films that appeared on the scene about a quarter century ago in Manipur. What could we hope from the Video-Digital films today? When honoured guests seldom come, it is but natural for the host to take away the chairs meant for them.

    It is quite disturbing.

     

  • Cinema in Kashmir

    Cinema in Kashmir

    Cinema screening was revived last week in Anantnag when a local theatre [highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]Heewan[/highlight]—they actually mean ‘Heavan’—welcomed a big batch of CRPF personnel as its first audience in more than three decades, to watch a screening of a Hindi film brought in from Jallundhar.

    Until about one year ago, the same movie hall was the shelter for the same CRPF men, who had been posted to not only guard the premises but also use the building as a base to send out patrolling parties into the militant infested town.

    In 1997, I had visited this theatre, curious to know the brand of the machine used in this theatre when it was operational. The projector room had been taken over by the gazette officer-in-charge, for use as his office-cum-bedroom.

    This theatre when operational was the biggest movie hall in the Valley with a seating capacity of 525 seats. It was owned by a family member of Bakshi Ghulam Mohd, once the Chief Minister of the State, and had Dolby Sound and a CinemaScope screen.

    I had to climb three floor levels to reach the projection room, where I discovered the small rewinding room with empty spools still lying around, and the main room, where a pair of Gaumont projectors were lying dead, still waiting for the arc rods to warm their belly. The cobwebs and dust everywhere were sufficient indication that the paramilitary had no intent to make this place permanent for themselves. It took nearly thirty years to prove their foresight.

    My first foray into theaters in Kashmir was in 1956 at [highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]The Regal[/highlight] near the Residency. I saw an English film. In Srinagar all movie halls screened their entertainment in four shows daily, the first one starting at around 11:30 A.M. with a break that coincided with the afternoon prayer. The intermission would be extended wisely, and then the second half of the film would proceed. All evening shows screened English films, except on Fridays when there would again be a lull for the Jumme ki namaaz.

    Cinema came to Kashmir around 1932, on demand from the resident British families who would drive up from Sialkot, Multan, and other cantonments, for the summer season. The British also decided to locate a big cantonment in the suburb of Srinagar town to watch over the doings of the Maharaja of Kashmir, who they never trusted. The first movie hall to be constructed was The Regal, located near the British Residency. A contractor family was pushed into constructing and running the establishment. An Indian exhibitor from Amritsar offered advice on how to run the establishment. And a film distributor of Jallundhar was attached to feed this movie hall with films.

    For the locals, it was [highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]Palladium[/highlight] theatre in Lal Chowk that was most patronized. I saw my next film, a Hindi feature, here, sitting on a rickety wooden seat and sharing the odour of local traders. Palladium screened the latest films and it required moviegoers to get their tickets in advance to avoid disappointment. The Palladium management was also more defiant of the militants, and continued its operations until one fateful night when the militants arrived and burnt down the entire premises. After a couple of years, the front portion of the theatre came to be used as a Police Post and thereafter the CRPF made it a base to guard the Lal Chowk from protests.

    The Valley of Kashmir had 19 cinema halls working in its peak business during the 1970s; nine of them were running in Srinagar and its suburbs. There were three halls in Anantnag, two in Baramula, and two in Sopore, and the rest were scattered in smaller towns. The Army had garrison movie theatres in Baramula and Sopore, appropriately named Thimayya and Zorawar, respectively.

    The rise of militancy and Wahabism proved the undoing of the cinema trade in the Valley. The first to send out signals that cinema viewing was haraam were cadets of the Hizbul Majaahideen who circulated messages to theatre managements to stop the screenings of films in their halls. First, the English films disappeared, since they also had occasionally Jewish artists, then, Hindi films were slowly withdrawn. Some enterprising theatre managers even started screening smuggled Pakistani films, but to no avail. Then, the militants burnt down Palladium in Srinagar and Nishat in Anantnag, to send a firm message to Kashmiris: NO FILMS FOR YOU.

    Cinema screenings in the Valley closed down totally by 1992. In fact, film shooting also came to a close in Kashmir Valley. This lasted till 1998, when Faroukh Abdullah, Chief Minister of J&K, went to Mumbai requesting for the return of film companies to the Valley. A Telugu film unit from Hyderabad made the beginning. They came, did a guerrilla shoot of a film song, and returned before the militants could even know that they had visited the place!

    Once the film shows were closed, the exhibitors waited for a signal to return to business, but when none came, all the property holders began to look for alternate activities to put these premises to an alternate use.

    Theaters in the Valley such as Heewan, [highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]Samad, Shiraz,[/highlight] and Neelam were offered to the security forces to convert the premises into camps. That ensured the physical safety of the infrastructures and an assured return as rents from the State.[highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]Khayyam[/highlight] in Nowpura was converted into a temporary hospital. [highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]Neelam,[/highlight] located behind the Srinagar State Secretariat, offered to screen films provided the State posted a large police contingent to avoid a militant’s protest. The State posted a police post and Neelam continued to screen single afternoon shows for the better period of the social ban, but the theater still observed the occasional calls of hartal, which is endemic in the Valley.

    The Valley eventually began to realize that post-1990 a new generation was born that had never been to a movie hall. Video piracy bloomed. The age of viewing films by streaming on laptops also commenced. The elders would talk of seeing films during their youth. And Doordarshan screened films periodically, which were no fun because of the frequent power breaks in homes. The charm of social gatherings to see films had disappeared. The more enterprising ones began to hire taxis to travel to Jammu and Udhampur to see their favourite films. Women would occasionally hire a busload of their friends for such outings. The new National Highway Bypass, which reduced the travel time between Jammu and Srinagar by nearly two hours, also led to the rise of the taxi shuttles between the two towns, solely to ferry cinema patrons.

    One enterprising Srinagar businessman, Vijay Dhar, son of D.P Dhar of yore, who had a hotel business in Srinagar, decided to restart cinema screenings in town. He started the [highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]Broadway[/highlight] theatre, but found his audience disappear often because of the many hartals that were announced. After running the theatre for three years, he closed it down and converted it into an assembly hall for weddings. Dhar is presently planning to return as a movie exhibitor, now that PM Narendra Modi has urged for the return of film screenings in the Valley. In a way, this asserts that normalcy is returning to the Valley. But more than that, the return of Bollywood would also help in the return of Indian tourism. No one has forgotten how in 1965 when Kashmir Ki Kali was released nation wide, the Valley was swamped by tourists keen to explore this part of the country. The people of Kashmir had found a new vocation for themselves, and supporting film shootings was just one of them.

    Adding to the call to bring cinema back to the Kashmir Valley are actors like Salman Khan, who stayed in the Valley during 2015 for a long duration to film Bajrangi Bhaijan. Kashmiri Pandit Vidhu Vinod Chopra too has endorsed Salman’s appeal. But the doors of the old premises are still closed.

    Permanently closed will be the doors of such old favourite centers of gatherings such as [highlight background=”#f79126″ color=”#ffffff”]Firdouz, Shah, Kapra, Regina and Naaz[/highlight]; names that spelt entertainment; whose owners not only brought down the shutters but also the physical structures, and had them replaced with solid investments that sustained their respective families.

    There is a move now in the State government to offer soft loans to any experienced enterprise that is willing to restart the business of cinema screenings In the Valley. All are still waiting and closely watching how the resident militants of the Valley react to the latest call of the State Government to revive cinema in the Valley.

    Even two brazen entrepreneurs will do for a beginning!

  • Anglo Indian Cinema

    Anglo Indian Cinema

    The term ‘Eurasian’ was coined sometime in the nineteenth century to originally mean any citizen living in India whose parentage was of British father and an Indian mother. The people to whom it applied weren’t quite pleased with it, so they changed it to ‘Anglo Indian’.

    In the century that followed, non-domiciled Britishers such as the Nobel laureate Rudyard Kipling and George Orwell who were born in India and chose to make India their home preferred to identify themselves by this. In the 1911 census this term was further modified/broadened to mean anyone “ a person whose father or any of whose other male progenitors in the male line is or was of European descent but who is domiciled within the territory of India and is or was born within such territory of parents habitually resident therein and not established there for temporary purposes only”. The last definition is the one that is presently enshrined in Article 366(2) of the Indian Constitution.

    With the interracial inter-mingling for over 400 years between the people of Britain and those of various parts of India it was inevitable that a race called the Anglo Indian would emerge. It did. And within this new racial order emerged many pidgin dialects, one of them being a mix of Hindi, Urdu and English words and syntax.

    For the better part of centuries the English and the non-English in India preferred to stay apart in public affairs and entertainment. The English acknowledged the major role played by Indian in the final victory of the Allied Forces over Germany and its associates. But this acknowledgement did not permeate to the Arts. England was compelled to finally cede Independence to India for various reasons.

    Art may not as yet have mingled but cinema now permitted the appearance of Indians in the cast of films made in India for international audiences and in films made in England.

    Indian cinema in the silent era did not seem to have dwelled much on Anglo Indian relations. Some film companies from Italy did make films here. They created films on Indian themes but did not show Indo-English social relations. With the arrival of sound the door opened for the use of language/dialogue and English writers used their Indian experience to adapt Indian folklore and historical episodes for screen reproduction. But before that, Imperial India needed to pay tribute to its empire builders. In 1935, an American production ‘Clive of India’ featuring Ronald Colman and Loretta Young did the theatre rounds. It was compulsory viewing within the Anglo Indian community and was screened, in particular, in railway institutes, gymkhanas, and cantonment cinemas.

    In the same year, The ‘Lives of a Bengal Lancer’ featuring Gary Cooper was released. The film was first planned in 1931 and a unit came to India to film the outdoors. Their arrival was mistimed as they arrived in the mid of summer. The film material got exposed and was mostly destroyed by the heat. However, what little remained was still used. This film was a biopic of a British army officer who had served in the North West Province of India.

    Ex Lt. Col. John Masters, who wrote 64 novels, was the first Anglo Indian off the block to see his novels on India and Indians being turned into feature films. In 1938, ‘The Drum’ was made. It highlighted the role of the British army in the North West Frontier. The same area was revisited in ‘King of The Khyber Rifles’ (1953), starring Tyrone Power and Terry Moore.

    Rudyard Kipling’s works too found screen adaptations. In 1939, a major star cast film ‘Gunga Din’ was released. It hoped to cash in on the new Indian interest growing internationally. Sadly, the film ran into rough weather with the nationalist Indians who sought its outright ban because it denigrated Indian culture and customs. Directed by George Steven, the film retold the story of a native bhistee (water carrier) called Gunga Din, who befriends three Britishers in their misadventures in trying to bring to book members of the Thugee criminal tribes. The ban remained a reality for Indian audiences, though the film circulated in other English-speaking parts of the world. A second attempt in 1950 proved successful when another Kipling work, ‘Kim’, was adapted for the screen. ‘Kim’ was an adventure film of a young boy who helps a lot of people and eventually gains recognition. Shot in Lucknow and Jaipur for its outdoor scenes, the film became staple screening in English medium schools in India, and the original novel was also introduced for studies in English literature.

    Once the fear of public protest was over, British and American film crews began cautious landings on the shores of India to film Anglo Indian themes. The works of Rudyard Kipling proved to be a goldmine. I think he holds the world record for the most number of adaptations of a single novel, namely, ‘Jungle Book’. Indeed this children’s book has seen nine versions by as many film directors, and in every case, the film made both friends and money.

    The first version was in 1942 when the Korda brothers fearing German prosecution migrated from Hungary to England and then to USA and decided that their first film in USA would be the Kipling novel.

    Alexander Korda came to India in early 1935 scouting for an Indian to play the hero. He discovered a boy in a village in Karnataka whom he adopted and took to Hollywood. There, he trained him to play the main lead in his new project. This boy was Selar Sabu (better known for his screen name, Sabu Dastagir), whose own brief life was remarkable enough to be made into a film. Korda made Elephant Boy with Sabu in 1937. The film was received with much acclaim. Sabu also became the first Asian actor to feature in a lead role. It encouraged Korda to take on a new Asian subject. He selected Rudyard Kipling’s novel ‘Jungle Book’ and made Sabu, the main hero.

    The film was a super box office hit in the USA when released in 1942. It was a successful film in the UK, where it released in 1950. And it received a warm welcome in India in 1952. In its latest incarnation, made in 2016, the film, by Walt Disney Productions, was released in India in English, and dubbed in Hindi, Tamil and Telugu. The film is now embedded in Indian film history as the first foreign film to gross the highest revenue, beating even the local competition. According to the last information available, the Indian earnings from ‘Jungle Book’ has crossed Rs. 248 crores. But its boy hero, Neel Sethi, still remains unknown.

    The commercial success of ‘Jungle Book’ in India also led to an overall review of Hollywood films. As a result, these days, Indian audiences get to see some of the major American studio films simultaneously as their counterparts in North America; occasionally, even earlier!

    Kipling’s charmed existence on screen once again found itself in 1975 in the John Huston India-adventure film, ‘The Man Who Would be a King’. The film starred Saeed Jaffery in a bit role, with the main leads taken over by Sean Connery and Michael Caine, whose wife is Indian.

    Kipling died before he could make his millions from film royalties. At least nine of the novels written by him were turned into successful films.

    We visualize Anglo Indian cinema in India essentially through the presence of actresses who ‘looked’ European. In isolation, there were some ladies who did enter Indian cinema and came to India under various circumstances. Helen Ann Robinson (Helen for all of us), entered India from Burma as a refugee in 1943. A few more were luck. Nadia was a circus artist from Australia. Ermaline came from Hungary. Then, there were the Baghdadi Jewish ladies—their parents were long settled in India—who were sought by Indian producers for their daring urban style and ‘Anglo’ looks. Ruby Myers alias Sulochana from Pune, remained the queen of the silent era for more than a decade and survived through the late 70s of Indian cinema as a poverty-affected artist. In between, ladies like Florence Ezekiel Nadira (Nadira), Rose Musleah (Rose), Lillian Ezra (Lillian), Sophie Abraham (Romila), Rachel Sofaer, Esther Victoria Abraham (Premila) and Pearl Padamsee filled the screen with their Anglo presence.

    There were others, like Patience Cooper and Cuckoo Moore, local girls from the metro cities, who also provided a cosmopolitan look in the films. And we should not forget the whole lines of unnamed dancing girls in frocks who filled the frame in so-called cabaret song and dance routines in Indian films, right up to the late 1960s, before they suddenly disappeared. This was because most of them migrated to Australia, Canada, England and New Zealand, to find boys to marry. Indian Cinema suddenly lost a lot of its film artist generation, which was unique.

    However the first foreign look in Indian cinema came as early as 1919 when an American lady, Dorothy Kingdon, entered India as a love-struck young actress attached to Baron Van Raven, a wealthy businessman. The latter stayed in South India for about eight months and financed the silent era film ‘Shakuntala’ (1920). It was pretty obvious right from the start that Shakuntala was a character tailor- made for Dorothy!! The lady was soon star-struck and decided to accept offers for some more roles in silent cinema. She could be said to open the doors for other ‘European looking’ ladies waiting in the wings. But then Dorothy soon faced serious competition when girls like Patience Cooper, Miss Jones and Ermaline stepped before the camera and walked all over Dorothy’s presence with their own oomph! There was no need for words. They were just required to throw their oomph. This they learnt from the imported films from England, USA, Italy, Germany, Denmark, and other lesser known sources of film production.

    India’s own contribution to world cinema with Anglo Indian artists rests with at least four extraordinary ladies—Vivian Mary Hartley (Vivian Leigh), Estelle Merle O’Brien Thompson (Merle Oberon) Julie Christie and Joan O’Callaghan (Anna Kashfi). Two of the mentioned stars also had an Indian Railway connection, though today’s Indian Railway may not be aware of this pedigree at all. Anna Kashfi is best remembered as Marlon Brando’s first wife, but she is better respected as a bestselling author of a book she wrote in the early 1980s called ‘Brando For Breakfast’, and many other essays published in American publications.

    And now, from out of the blue, comes this beautiful lass, Olivia Colman, holding her Best Actress ‘Oscar’ statue for her portrayal of Queen Anne in ‘The Favourite’ (2018). Olivia has an Indian connection. Her great-great-great-great grandmother was an Indian lady from Kishanganj, Bihar! That was the place where the British cultivated Indigo and Opium for export through the East India Company.

    The British actress Julie Christie does not hide her origin, which goes back to the tea gardens of Chabua, Assam. She is ranked among the great artists of the 20th century. We remember her role in ‘Dr Zhivago’. Two recently lesser known ladies of the silver screen in Indian cinema are Lara Dutta and Diana Hayden.

    The Anglo Indian community gave us not only women artists but also some well know names from the men’s world who ruled the world of entertainment in their respective times. They were singers Cliff Richard from Lucknow and Engelbert Humperdinck from Chennai; actor Ben Kingsley from Gujarat; and writers like Rudyard Kipling, George Orwell, William Makepeace Thackeray, and Ruskin Bond. Unfortunately, some of the Anglo Indians who became prominent in public life shunned their Indian origin and attributed their dark coloured skin to various other circumstances.

    Quite many males in this community have taken to acting in the theater, but very are known to have done films. One of the first is George Baker, who intially started out in theater. He came into the limelight as the lead actor of ‘Chameli Memsahib’, an Assamese film that went on to win two National Film Awards.

    I am tempted to include in this essay the contribution of Tom Alter. Though an American by birth he finally sought Indian citizenship and played an important part in the development of the English speaking theatre, and filled many roles of Britishers in the Indian scenario.

    We include within the definition of Anglo Indian cinema also those films which had their origins outside of India, were India-themed films, were made by non-Indians, and which had a cast of artists of both Indian and foreign origins. Like the British Empire, this genre had a beginning and has a possible ending too.

    The first of the real Anglo Indian films seems to be ‘Bhowani Junction’ (1956) based on the novel of the same name by John Masters. The film was significant for both Ava Gardner who played the main female lead as well as the issue that she portrayed onscreen. It was supposed to have been made in India, but the newly-independent Indian government denied the crew shooting permission, stating that the film could hurt the feelings of the Anglo Indian community. The film unit therefore walked into Pakistan and made their film there, and recreated the backdrop of Delhi in Lahore. It was also the time when Ava Gardner fell in love during the shooting of this film. Later, as she lay on her deathbed afflicted with debilitating cancer, Stewart Granger called on her. As he sat by the bedside Ava went back in time recalling her days in Hollywood and the many lovers she had had. Then, in a brief moment of emotion, she whispered to Stewart, ‘Remember how we made love in ‘Bhowani Junction’? And Stewart whispered, ‘Yes, my darling, it was heavenly’. Exhausted, Ava sank into a light sleep.

    There is a moment in this film when Ava the Anglo Indian girl has to decide whether she will stay in India where her roots were or go along with the British defence officer who is returning to England. In one impulsive moment she decides to discard India and to move to England. In real life too, thousands of Anglo Indians were compelled to take that decision in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Those in most parts of the country who decided to stay back realized that they were not acceptable to the new India emerging in an aggressive manner.

    John Masters saw two more of his novels being turned into films, namely, Night Runners of Bengal and The Deceivers.

    A BBC serial ‘The Jewel In the Crown’ (1984) and three feature films, namely, ’36 Chowranghee Lane’ (1981), Bara Din (1998) and ’Bow Barracks Forever’ (2004), beautifully sum up the dilemma of a majority of the Anglo Indians who stayed behind in the hope that they would be properly integrated into the social fabric of independent India. Sadly, this relatively small community was exploited in most States of India, with perhaps the exception of Kerala, and finally ignored and left to their fate. Jennifer Kendall played the role of a lifetime as Ms Violet Stoneham, a retired teacher exploited by her former student, in ’36 Chowranghee Lane’. In ‘Mahanagar’ (1963), Satyajit Ray comments on the vulnerability of the Anglo Indian young girl who could be exploited by her Indian employee because this woman had no huge community to fall back on for personal protection.

    There are not many films in which the dilemma of the assimilation of members of the Anglo India with communities outside of their own has been portrayed. In ‘Batoan Batoan Mein’ (1979), this aspect of uncertainty came to be reflected. The rejection to acknowledge the genius in this community was at the same time pointed out in ‘Albert Pinto Ko Gussa Kyon Aata Hai’ (1980). In this film, an expert motor mechanic wants to be recognised for his expertise by his client and to be treated at par socially, but this status is refused, and Pinto is rebuffed.

    In ‘Julie’ (1975), a remake of the Malayalam film ‘Chattakkari’ (1974), the social dilemma of the Anglo Indian family is again pointed to when a Christian girl finds rejection in a wider Hindu world, but the situation is resolved with her being finally accepted.

    The only film that touched on the missionary work of foreigners was ‘Miss Beatty’s Children’ (1992), directed by the Punjabi-born Pamela Rookes, nee Juneja.

    The only foreigner who contributed to Indian cinema in any material manner was the American citizen Ellis R. Dungan. Dungan was a cinematographer who was invited by an Indian associated with the Tamil film industry for a brief stay. Dungan however stayed for nearly 15 years in Chennai (1936-1950) and made over 20 well-known feature films, many of them commercial ‘hits’. Dungan also introduced many modern film techniques to make Tamil cinema technically superior to Hindi cinema. He is not remembered for this. But at least he is credited with one contribution—that of introducing the cabaret dance number into Indian cinema!! That is where we have the ever lasting contribution of an Anglo Indian person to the Indian film industry through Helen Ann Robinson, Helen to all of us.

    Helen entered Indian territory in 1943 as a Burmese refugee with her family. She first came to Guwahati, then went to Calcutta, and finally moved to Mumbai. She was befriended by another Anglo Indian dancer, Cuckoo Moore, who taught her some common dance steps and got her into the dance line of junior artists. Helen’s first film is arguably ‘Shabistan’ (1951). No one noticed her. Except Bhagwan Dada, an actor who was good in modern floor dancing. Helen came under his tutelage. Bhagwan introduced her to a higher grade of dancing, and Helen slowly climbed the ladder of success until she hit the jackpot in ‘Howrah Bridge’ (1958). The rest is history. Helen was associated with the Indian film industry for 7 decades, and worked in more than 700 films in 8 languages—Tamil, Hindi, Marathi, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada, Bengali and English. She remains to date as one of the most endearing images of the Anglo Indian community in India.

    There is another segment of Anglo Indian cinema that we can talk of. This is the Christian representation in Indian films. Most of the major regional cinemas have featured this category. Indian cinema has a large representation from the Christian community both on and off screen. They could be seen in large numbers in chorus line-ups in songs. Then, towards the end of the 1960s, they began to thin out. In Hindi cinema, their number has practically ended.

    It was in Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s ‘Khamoshi’ (2003) that a Christian family held centre stage. Till then we all remembered Lalita Pawar as Mrs. L. D’Sa in ‘Anari’ (1959) and as the titular character in ‘Mem-Didi’ (1961). Bhansali followed this up with another Anglo Indian subject, ‘Black’ (2005), taking his camera into the household of the McNelly’s and focussing on their deaf and dumb girl.

    Perhaps we cannot term Indian films that were made in India by foreign crews and in which Indian film artists played either walk-along or prominent roles as Anglo Indian cinema. However, since we are on a related subject, a few such important films are talked about here simply for the records.

    For some time, I.S. Johar represented Indian cinema in foreign films. He was in ‘Lawrence of Arabia’, ‘Harry Black and the Tiger’, ‘North West Frontier’, ‘Death on the Nile’ and ‘Maya’. He also acted in two Italian films. Similarly Saeed Jaffrey too featured in many English-language films. And so did Victor Banerjee (‘Passage to India’, ‘Anthony Firangee’). Actor Kabir Bedi elevated the Indian presence in the James Bond film ‘Octopussy’ and was quite a presence in the Italian serial ‘Sandokan’. The best Indian villain would easily be Anil Kapoor in ‘Slumdog Millionaire’, the film that along with ‘Gandhi’ placed India on the centre stage of the world audience and took her out for an ‘Oscar’ evening.

    When foreign film directors came to film their subjects in India they had to suffer immense tribulation to get their clearances before they could start shooting. It took Richard Attenborough nearly thirty years to get through an approval for the script of ‘Gandhi’. Mark Robson’s film ‘Nine Hours to Rama’ fared worse. It was banned. ‘Encounter of the Third Kind’ faced crowd control problems, ‘Indiana Jones….’ and ‘Purple Plain’ were refused permission and they completed their respective films in Sri Lanka. So was the case of ‘Bridge on the River Kwai’. And hardly anyone would recall ‘Wind Cannot Read’, a film that had Dirk Bogart in the lead.

    There was closer scrutiny of films under production when they involved India-Britain relations. European film directors perhaps had it easier. Jean Renoir, the French film director, made ‘The River’ in 1951 and faced no trouble. So was the case of ‘Pardesi’, which was a Soviet-India production.

    There was also a small category of ‘India’ being created in film studios of Hollywood, or Pinewood. ‘Rains of Ranchipur’ featuring Richard Burton and Lana Turner was shot completely in film studios. The sati rescue episode in ‘Around the World in Eighty Days’ was also a studio job, or at least, it was not shot in India.

    There is no sizable population of Anglo Indians left in India anymore. Most of them are concentrated in pockets in Kolkata, Chennai, Kochi, Bangalore Dehra Doon, and Mccluskieganj, an isolated habitat in a corner outside Ranchi. Their world population is estimated at around 500,000, but in India it is only about 150,000. The English-speaking schools are now inhabited majorly by converted Christians, and the true Anglo Indian remains for most part just a memory. ‘A Death in the Ganj’ (2016) is one of the last films that recalled this community.

    It seems the term Anglo India could still be retained if the definition of the term is altered, thereby allowing a new type of people to be included in this category.

    In 1969, a gentleman from England came to India to teach English and Theatre. He was Barry John. He first stationed himself in Bangalore and then moved to Delhi. Here he trained Shah Rukh Khan, Naseeuddin Shah, Pradip Krishan, Manohar Singh and many great names, in professional acting. Later, he moved to Mumbai and opened a theatre workshop. Barry John then decided to give up his British passport and take Indian citizenship. He also accepted to play ‘British’ roles when called on to do so by his Indian film directors, including Satyajit Ray. Barry in my estimate is an Anglo Indian who represents the better of the two nationalities. As India moves up in the trajectory of becoming a bigger economic and cultural power, there will be more persons from England who may make India their home.

    In 1998, film enthusiast Leslie Carvalho made a low budget film, ‘Outhouse‘, which went on to win the G. Aravindam Puraskaram. The film narrated the struggle of an Anglo-Indian lady in Bangalore to assert her rights and establish her identity in an alien culture.

    Try as one may, by edicts, laws and barricades, when two communities come face to face, when two religions come face to face, and when two genders also come face to face, there is bound to be some exchange of glances, customs and snatches of languages. John Barry and Tom Alter are just individuals. But when the English decided to stay in India to rule and brought their families, this separation did not work. The dilemma was first shown in ‘Janoon’ (1978), based on a short story by a fellow Anglo Indian, Ruskin Bond. This problem kept on repeating itself as the new community was born out of social intermingling and racial conversions.

    A reverse migration began to take place in 1953 with Indians moving to England. It finally led to the island nation being swamped by people who were referred to as ‘Asians’. From India, labour hands moved from Punjab, Bengal and Andhra Pradesh to work the steel mills, and then the more sophisticated moved out from the Indian medical colleges to sustain the National Health Schemes. Some took to the Arts.

    The more fair skinned took to marrying the local girls and their children born now came under our definition of Anglo Indians where one needed to do a bit of ‘arm twisting’ and say Indians, for British in the original term. These ‘Anglo Indians’ first took hold of the local theatre and having made a mark there, started taking small steps as bit players in films. Socialist artists would not have found fault with the new class of mulattoes sharing the brief spotlights with them.

    An early bird in this case was Ben Kingsley who moved from theatre to television and finally to brief moments in cinema, until ‘Gandhi’ hit him straight! Others of his kind, followed. The more “British” with Indian fathers and English mothers were soon entering the entertainment industry as new audiences had more presence of non-British gentry. Ben Kingsley alias Krishna Bhanji, Navin Andrew from Kerala, Dev Patel, Parminder Nagra (of ‘Bend It Like Becham’ fame), Archie Panjabi, Nina Wadia, and Indira Ann Verma are familiar names in England who represent the new Anglo Indian race that is rising in that land, and filling the space of that termed community, which is becoming a victim of old age and times.

    The new multiracial cinema in England has also seen lead Indian actors join their resident counterparts to create shows that have thrown light on the cultural harmony that exists in the British Isles. Prominent actors from India include the late Om Puri and Anupam Kher.

    Finally, a place can also represent the community of Anglo Indians by the activities it generates. This we find in the cinema of Kerala, where things are a lot different.

    It has become quite the trend these days to shoot in and around the European heritage zone of Fort Cochin, and to often include a stereotype Fort Cochin character. This erstwhile Anglo Indian bastion in Kerala has a rare distinction—it is one of the few, if not only, places in the country where this community continuously enjoyed being treated with immense respect and suddenly began to flourish in the mid 90s with the opening up of the economy, and where quite a sizeable number of non-Anglo Indians spoke the queen’s language in decades gone by.

    In the olden days, residents of other districts of Kerala were in fact so envious of the European-style culture of Fort Cochin that many ridiculously wild rumours existed of what really went on there, and a proverb too was created that says, “Kochi kunduverku achchivenda”. Figuratively, “He who has once seen Cochin loses all inclination of going back to his wife and home.” This is reminiscent of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “A stately pleasure dome decree… For he on honey-dew hath fed, and drunk the milk of Paradise”.

    Till a few decades ago, Malayali society lived with the massive pretense that pre- and extra-marital sex never happened among their people. Quite understandably therefore whenever such “immoral” acts were required to be shown in a Malayalam film, the female character was conveniently typecast as an Anglo Indian. To be specific, a traditional Malayali girl with neither exposure to European culture nor poise, wore western outfits for the role, drank black tea from a bottle, “danced” with two left feet, and happily mouthed English dialogues in an atrocious village accent.

    No music plays in Fort Cochin now like before. The ballroom floors are empty. And the ambiance too isn’t quite like what it was. Most Anglo Indians who lived there have migrated to more lucrative English-speaking lands, and it is improbable that they would ever want to return. The merriment may have disappeared from Fort Cochin and other such Anglo Indian zones of India, but it continues unabated in places such as Canada, Australia, England, & the US. History could one day perhaps completely erase all trace of the Anglo Indian from the soil of India and make its cinema too a distant memory, but the soul of the Anglo Indian has a heritage that is eternal.

  • Cinema in Uttar Pradesh

    Cinema in Uttar Pradesh

    Few would know that once upon a time Lucknow also featured on the map of India as a centre of film production.

    Cinema came to Lucknow via Calcutta. The railway line of the East India Railways (EIR) traversed from Howrah, to Allahabad, to Agra and ended at Ambala. On this route there was much traffic of Englishmen moving into Punjab, of Bengali lower middle class moving into Punjab seeking jobs and the rich Bengali bhadralok venturing into Oudh for holidays and trade.

    Lucknow was the centre for most of the Zamindaars (land owning gentry) whose wards were being sent abroad for higher education. The presence of the cantonment also suggested the presence of an army contingent . Lucknow had prosperity, youth and culture. Therefore when some people started constructing new cinema halls, there were others who dreamt of making films, and so this had to happen.

    The wherewithal for film production came from the Bengali film makers who were scouting for funds for making new films. It was the time when silent films were being made and there was no language barriers. These silent films could be taken to any part of the world and shown on rent or sold outright.

    Around 1922, some young scions of the landowning class decided to create a film cooperative to produce films. The production group was registered as Zamindara Film Company . This film company made two films and then closed down business.

    In 1927, another set of businessmen created a new company for producing films and established a film production centre on modern lines. This was called the Kailash Studio which was located on a big plot of land opposite the Burlington Hotel in Hussainganj. Kailash Studio ran its business for nearly nine years and made five films. The later famed music composer, Naushad Ali, was also employed here briefly as an assistant table player for the Studio orchestra before he moved to the local All India Radio and finally moved to Bombay to join the crowd of youth seeking a career in the film business.

    The closure of Kailash Studio sometime in 1934 finally also put an end to Lucknow being associated with film production. But film exhibition business flourished. From early 1950s Lucknow began to offer artists to the Hindi film industry starting with Naushad Ali, Pushpa Hans, Bina Rai, Sunil Dutt (he lived in Aminabad) Jaan Nisar Akhtar, Muzaffar Ali, Sudhir Misra, and Anupam Kher who worked in Bhartendu Academy for a couple of years.

    It was Dilip Kumar who felt that Uttar Pradesh should have a film production centre and he applied for a piece of agricultural land in 1961, to develop a film studio. The State government allotted a piece of land in Mohan Nagar area but Dilip Kumar could not develop this idea and returned the land to the government. Sunil Dutt and Nargis followed the same route and then gave up the idea. All felt this business could not be run sitting in Bombay. Again in 1976, when Narain Dutt Tiwari was the CM, a scheme to bring industries into UP was conceived and NOIDA was planned. A full sector was earmarked for allotting plots to film and television operators. Some Bombay film producers were asked to buy some plots and start offering studio facilities. While film production did not take off, but when television activity came into being in 1983 after the Asian Games, NOIDA sprang into big activity in film crafts.

    It was Muzaffar Ali when he started his film Gaman (1979) and Aagaman that UP began to be talked of as a possible place to shoot outdoor scenes of rural countryside. A major portion of the Shyam Benegal film Junoon (1979) was shot in Malihabad in the suburb of Lucknow. Ismail Merchant made his film Shakespearewala partly in Lucknow. Film Ghadar was also filmed in Lucknow.

    Besides Lucknow, the other town which began to see visits of film crews from parts of India and even abroad, was Agra. Ismail Merchant again shot a portion of his colour film Guru in Varanasi.

    Uttar Pradesh got special attention finally when Mulayam Singh became the Chief Minister for the first time with his political friend Amar Singh in tow.

    Amar Singh had friends in Mumbai who wanted a new friendly film policy to be created in UP. This film policy was announced in the year 1999 which provided for big subsidy as incentives to film makers when they made films in UP and in Hindi. A series of small budget films are made and the promise of film subsidies was kept. This encouraged the bigger film producers to also move in. Today Uttar Pradesh is the back ground for over fifty film titles under production and another three dozen projects are in various stages of approval.  UP which was once considered too dangerous a place for film folks to visit for promotional appearances or film shooting, is now bristling with film activity. A Rekha may still create a public stampede, but lesser artists can freely face the camera unmindful of interference by onlookers, who now appreciate the value of “silence” call from the film director at work.

    All this has led to some reduction in pressure of work in the indoor studies in Mumbai. But Uttar Pradesh is now threatening to provide more incentives of hassle free studio facilities and strike free environment to film production companies.

    The situation in Mumbai for film makers is riddled with artist labour union directives which make it expensive for any film startup to meet the demands. The Shiv Sena managed unions behave in a dictatorial manner, threatening closure of film project if they did not approve of the nationality of the artist. UP has no hiccups on this issue.

    With the development of a new language cinema in Bhojpuri language, Varanasi has now emerged as a regular film shooting centre alternate to Mumbai and its neighbourhood. And with the return of Haryanavi language cinema, Meerut region is again a thriving film business centre which is seeing a regular film cassette business running at least into Rs 100 crore.  An occasional film production team can also be seen making films in the local language. As for Lucknow, its air connectivity directly by air and rail and the development of good hotels for the stay of lesser stars, has helped big film production companies to anchor themselves in Lucknow and complete their projects at half the cost if the same were done in Mumbai.

    How attractive has Uttar Pradesh become for film producers? A film producer who shots his film in UP can now see a subsidy offer upto Rs 2 crore which for a small film company be half the production cost. He gets an incentive of Rs 25 lakhs if the film employs five local artists, another Rs 50 lakhs if all the artists are from the State. This could mean that an astute film maker can get the State of UP fund upto 70 percent of the film production cost. Cities like Kanpur, Lucknow, Dehra Doon(Uttrakhand), Allahabad, Varanasi, Aligarh can offer fairly good class of acting talent to film companies and NOIDA has package deals in post production work. Mumbai can be given a farewell to visit for business if it comes to the crunch.

    But there is a track two story of cinema in Uttar Pradesh. This is the work done by the government away from the film world of Bombay.

    Beginning from 1947, as soon as the country attained its independence, the govt of United Provinces established its Department of Information. It also employed one Laxmi Kant Shukla, a former production manager from Bombay Talkies Production studios of Bombay to revamp the department. The UP dept of Information in the 1950s had two ‘star’ employees, Suresh Nigam and Sarla Sahni.

    Nigam had joined the State department after doing a stint in the film studios of Bombay. As for Sarla Sahni, she had been briefly a protégée of the famous documentary film maker from Germany Leni Riefenstahl when the German lady was held back in France facing charges of Nazi collaboration during 1948-55.

    Sarla Sahni took some of feisty dust from her German guru and was well known in the UP official circles as the ‘pants- officer’. It was Sarla Shni who pulled the first film crews from Bombay to come and use the countryside for their productions.

    It was in her time that the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Corporation was established to promote films made in UP by film producers and also to show them on cinema theatres run by this Corporation. Unfortunately this experiment failed miserably because no one had learnt in the government how the film trade operated. There were also many cases of fund embezzlements. In 2000 the ‘Film Bandhu’ office was opened to implement the new State film policy.

    Till date this State level corporation has supported over fifty film productions and is considered a success story in the context of UP government ‘culture’. Film production companies are no more afraid to come to Lucknow and Varanasi to make films which have a mix of small town and rural backgrounds. Successful films like Bareilly Ki Barfi, Toilet:Ek Prem Katha, Bahen Hogi Teri, Mukti Bhavan, Masaan, Bunty Aur Bubly, Tannu Weds Manu, Dedh Ishquiyaa, Jolly LLB, Raid, Youngistaan, are some examples of films which were made in several parts of the State. There are at least another 36 titles awaiting scrutiny because they involve State subsidies.

    Lucknow in the past was identified by Oudh culture of good tehzeeb (manners) as seen in films like Mere Mehboob, Chaudhveen Ka Chand, Ghazal, Gomti Ke Kinare, Benazir, Shatranj Ke Khilari, Junoon, Umrao Jan, Umrao Jan Ada and more. The old time faded away as the culture regressed into the old bricks of the city. Modern Lucknow took its place, and has not lost any of its glint.